I recently read a brief article by Robert Perry that
rasied an extremely intereting point. One I think is very
worthy of conversation.

What do you think? He says:

"A great deal of the accepted wisdom about the Course is simply not true.

To give you a small tase of what I mean, let's look at something as basic
as the miracle. We all know that a miracle is a shift in perception, right?...
Yet actually the Course nevr says this, not once. While it does occasionally
talk about miracles that are internal, it almost always characterizes a miracle
as an extension of healed perception from a giver (or "miracle worker") to a
receiver (a "miracle receiver"-- see T I.VII.3:10 and 2.V.3:2). ...

... When people approach the Course, I see them do the same few things
over and over again. First, they primarily see what they have been taught to
see, by other students and teachers, as well as the general spiritual
smorgasbord out there. You can even tell which teachers and teachings
they have been influenced by. Second, they are mostly blind to the things
they haven't been taught to see. Third, they latch onto a few simple concepts
and see them everywhere."

What do you think? I tend to agree. There are many ideas in the books
that are rarely discussed.